PROBABLY PROBABLY ALL PROBABLY ALL YOU PROBABLY ALL YOU REMEMBER PROBABLY ALL YOU REMEMBER WHEN PROBABLY ALL YOU REMEMBER WHEN
RED PROBABLY ALL YOU REMEMBER WHEN
RED LIGHT PROBABLY ALL YOU REMEMBER WHEN
RED LIGHT CAMERAS PROBABLY ALL YOU REMEMBER WHEN
RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE PROBABLY ALL YOU REMEMBER WHEN
RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE FIRST RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE FIRST RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE FIRST
INTRODUCED RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE FIRST
INTRODUCED IN RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE FIRST
INTRODUCED IN NEW RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE FIRST
INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS RED LIGHT CAMERAS WERE FIRST
INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS AND INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS AND INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS AND
SOME INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS AND
SOME OF INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS AND
SOME OF YOU INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS AND
SOME OF YOU MAY INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS AND
SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE INTRODUCED IN NEW ORLEANS AND
SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE GOTTEN SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE GOTTEN SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE GOTTEN
SOME SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE GOTTEN
SOME TICKETS. SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE GOTTEN
SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE GOTTEN
SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE GOTTEN
SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE GOTTEN
SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF US SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF US SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF US
WILL SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF US
WILL AFTER SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF US
WILL AFTER A SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF US
WILL AFTER A MAJOR SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF US
WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT SOME TICKETS. BUT SOME OF US
WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT RULING WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT RULING WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT RULING
THIS WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT RULING
THIS WEEK WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT RULING
THIS WEEK ANYBODY WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT RULING
THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT RULING
THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO PAID WILL AFTER A MAJOR COURT RULING
THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO PAID A THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO PAID A THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO PAID A
TICKET THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO PAID A
TICKET DURING THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO PAID A
TICKET DURING THOSE THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO PAID A
TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THIS WEEK ANYBODY WHO PAID A
TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THREE TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THREE TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THREE
YEARS TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THREE
YEARS STARTING TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THREE
YEARS STARTING IN TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THREE
YEARS STARTING IN 2008 TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THREE
YEARS STARTING IN 2008 MAY TICKET DURING THOSE FIRST THREE
YEARS STARTING IN 2008 MAY BE YEARS STARTING IN 2008 MAY BE YEARS STARTING IN 2008 MAY BE
DUE YEARS STARTING IN 2008 MAY BE
DUE FOR YEARS STARTING IN 2008 MAY BE
DUE FOR A YEARS STARTING IN 2008 MAY BE
DUE FOR A REFUND YEARS STARTING IN 2008 MAY BE
DUE FOR A REFUND REFUND. DUE FOR A REFUND REFUND. DUE FOR A REFUND REFUND.
MICROSOFT DUE FOR A REFUND REFUND.
MICROSOFT OH DUE FOR A REFUND REFUND.
MICROSOFT OH FILL DUE FOR A REFUND REFUND.
MICROSOFT OH FILL US DUE FOR A REFUND REFUND.
MICROSOFT OH FILL US IN. DUE FOR A REFUND REFUND.
MICROSOFT OH FILL US IN. WELL MICROSOFT OH FILL US IN. WELL MICROSOFT OH FILL US IN. WELL
THAT’S MICROSOFT OH FILL US IN. WELL
THAT’S EXACTLY MICROSOFT OH FILL US IN. WELL
THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT. MICROSOFT OH FILL US IN. WELL
THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT. KAREN THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT. KAREN THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT. KAREN
KENNEDY THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT. KAREN
KENNEDY THE THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT. KAREN
KENNEDY THE 4TH THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT. KAREN
KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT THAT’S EXACTLY RIGHT. KAREN
KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT
OF KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEAL KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEAL THIS KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEAL THIS WEEK KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEAL THIS WEEK UPHELD KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEAL THIS WEEK UPHELD A KENNEDY THE 4TH CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEAL THIS WEEK UPHELD A 25 OF APPEAL THIS WEEK UPHELD A 25 OF APPEAL THIS WEEK UPHELD A 25
MILLION OF APPEAL THIS WEEK UPHELD A 25
MILLION DOLLAR OF APPEAL THIS WEEK UPHELD A 25
MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT OF APPEAL THIS WEEK UPHELD A 25
MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT IN MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT IN MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT IN
REFUNDS MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT IN
REFUNDS FOR MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT IN
REFUNDS FOR ABOUT MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT IN
REFUNDS FOR ABOUT TWO MILLION DOLLAR JUDGMENT IN
REFUNDS FOR ABOUT TWO HUNDRED REFUNDS FOR ABOUT TWO HUNDRED REFUNDS FOR ABOUT TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND REFUNDS FOR ABOUT TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND PEOPLE REFUNDS FOR ABOUT TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO REFUNDS FOR ABOUT TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT REFUNDS FOR ABOUT TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT THOSE THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT THOSE THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT THOSE
RED THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT THOSE
RED LIGHT THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT THOSE
RED LIGHT CAMERA THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT THOSE
RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT THOSE
RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS IN THOUSAND PEOPLE WHO GOT THOSE
RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS IN NEW RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS IN NEW RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS IN NEW
ORLEANS RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS IN NEW
ORLEANS BETWEEN RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS IN NEW
ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS IN NEW
ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 AND RED LIGHT CAMERA TICKETS IN NEW
ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010. ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010. ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010.
THE ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010.
THE CLASS ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010.
THE CLASS ACTION ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010.
THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT ORLEANS BETWEEN 2008 AND 2010.
THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT HAS THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT HAS THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT HAS
BOUNCED THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT HAS
BOUNCED AROUND THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT HAS
BOUNCED AROUND THE THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT HAS
BOUNCED AROUND THE COURT THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT HAS
BOUNCED AROUND THE COURT SINCE BOUNCED AROUND THE COURT SINCE BOUNCED AROUND THE COURT SINCE
2010 BOUNCED AROUND THE COURT SINCE
2010 BUT BOUNCED AROUND THE COURT SINCE
2010 BUT THE BOUNCED AROUND THE COURT SINCE
2010 BUT THE DISTRICT BOUNCED AROUND THE COURT SINCE
2010 BUT THE DISTRICT COURT 2010 BUT THE DISTRICT COURT 2010 BUT THE DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE 2010 BUT THE DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE RULING 2010 BUT THE DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE RULING AGAINST 2010 BUT THE DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE 2010 BUT THE DISTRICT COURT
JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE CITY JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE CITY JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE CITY
IN JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE CITY
IN 2017 JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE CITY
IN 2017 THE JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE CITY
IN 2017 THE CITY JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE CITY
IN 2017 THE CITY APPEALED JUDGE RULING AGAINST THE CITY
IN 2017 THE CITY APPEALED BUT IN 2017 THE CITY APPEALED BUT IN 2017 THE CITY APPEALED BUT
THE IN 2017 THE CITY APPEALED BUT
THE APPEALS IN 2017 THE CITY APPEALED BUT
THE APPEALS COURT IN 2017 THE CITY APPEALED BUT
THE APPEALS COURT RULED THE APPEALS COURT RULED THE APPEALS COURT RULED
WEDNESDAY THE APPEALS COURT RULED
WEDNESDAY THAT THE APPEALS COURT RULED
WEDNESDAY THAT THE THE APPEALS COURT RULED
WEDNESDAY THAT THE CITY WEDNESDAY THAT THE CITY WEDNESDAY THAT THE CITY
VIOLATED WEDNESDAY THAT THE CITY
VIOLATED ITS WEDNESDAY THAT THE CITY
VIOLATED ITS OWN WEDNESDAY THAT THE CITY
VIOLATED ITS OWN CHARTER WEDNESDAY THAT THE CITY
VIOLATED ITS OWN CHARTER BY VIOLATED ITS OWN CHARTER BY VIOLATED ITS OWN CHARTER BY
LETTING VIOLATED ITS OWN CHARTER BY
LETTING CITY VIOLATED ITS OWN CHARTER BY
LETTING CITY HALL VIOLATED ITS OWN CHARTER BY
LETTING CITY HALL PROCESS VIOLATED ITS OWN CHARTER BY
LETTING CITY HALL PROCESS THE LETTING CITY HALL PROCESS THE LETTING CITY HALL PROCESS THE
TICKETS LETTING CITY HALL PROCESS THE
TICKETS INSTEAD LETTING CITY HALL PROCESS THE
TICKETS INSTEAD OF LETTING CITY HALL PROCESS THE
TICKETS INSTEAD OF THE LETTING CITY HALL PROCESS THE
TICKETS INSTEAD OF THE POLICE TICKETS INSTEAD OF THE POLICE TICKETS INSTEAD OF THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT TICKETS INSTEAD OF THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT SO TICKETS INSTEAD OF THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT SO WHAT TICKETS INSTEAD OF THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT SO WHAT HAPPENS DEPARTMENT SO WHAT HAPPENS DEPARTMENT SO WHAT HAPPENS
NEXT. DEPARTMENT SO WHAT HAPPENS
NEXT. WELL DEPARTMENT SO WHAT HAPPENS
NEXT. WELL THE DEPARTMENT SO WHAT HAPPENS
NEXT. WELL THE CITY DEPARTMENT SO WHAT HAPPENS
NEXT. WELL THE CITY HAS NEXT. WELL THE CITY HAS NEXT. WELL THE CITY HAS
INDICATED NEXT. WELL THE CITY HAS
INDICATED THAT NEXT. WELL THE CITY HAS
INDICATED THAT IT NEXT. WELL THE CITY HAS
INDICATED THAT IT WILL NEXT. WELL THE CITY HAS
INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL
IT INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL
IT HAS INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL
IT HAS TO INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL
IT HAS TO DECIDE INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL
IT HAS TO DECIDE WHETHER INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL
IT HAS TO DECIDE WHETHER TO INDICATED THAT IT WILL APPEAL
IT HAS TO DECIDE WHETHER TO TRY IT HAS TO DECIDE WHETHER TO TRY IT HAS TO DECIDE WHETHER TO TRY
FOR IT HAS TO DECIDE WHETHER TO TRY
FOR A IT HAS TO DECIDE WHETHER TO TRY
FOR A RECONSIDERATION IT HAS TO DECIDE WHETHER TO TRY
FOR A RECONSIDERATION BEFORE FOR A RECONSIDERATION BEFORE FOR A RECONSIDERATION BEFORE
THE FOR A RECONSIDERATION BEFORE
THE 4TH FOR A RECONSIDERATION BEFORE
THE 4TH CIRCUIT. FOR A RECONSIDERATION BEFORE
THE 4TH CIRCUIT. VERY FOR A RECONSIDERATION BEFORE
THE 4TH CIRCUIT. VERY UNLIKELY THE 4TH CIRCUIT. VERY UNLIKELY THE 4TH CIRCUIT. VERY UNLIKELY
CONSIDERING THE 4TH CIRCUIT. VERY UNLIKELY
CONSIDERING THAT THE 4TH CIRCUIT. VERY UNLIKELY
CONSIDERING THAT ONE THE 4TH CIRCUIT. VERY UNLIKELY
CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE 4TH CIRCUIT. VERY UNLIKELY
CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE
THREE CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE
THREE JUDGES CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE
THREE JUDGES ON CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE
THREE JUDGES ON THE CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE
THREE JUDGES ON THE PANEL CONSIDERING THAT ONE OF THE
THREE JUDGES ON THE PANEL OF THREE JUDGES ON THE PANEL OF THREE JUDGES ON THE PANEL OF
WEDNESDAY’S THREE JUDGES ON THE PANEL OF
WEDNESDAY’S RULING THREE JUDGES ON THE PANEL OF
WEDNESDAY’S RULING WAS THREE JUDGES ON THE PANEL OF
WEDNESDAY’S RULING WAS THAT WEDNESDAY’S RULING WAS THAT WEDNESDAY’S RULING WAS THAT
CHIEF WEDNESDAY’S RULING WAS THAT
CHIEF JUSTICE WEDNESDAY’S RULING WAS THAT
CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES WEDNESDAY’S RULING WAS THAT
CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES MCKAY. WEDNESDAY’S RULING WAS THAT
CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES MCKAY. THE CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES MCKAY. THE CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES MCKAY. THE
OTHER CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES MCKAY. THE
OTHER OPTION CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES MCKAY. THE
OTHER OPTION IS CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES MCKAY. THE
OTHER OPTION IS TO CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES MCKAY. THE
OTHER OPTION IS TO APPEAL OTHER OPTION IS TO APPEAL OTHER OPTION IS TO APPEAL
TO OTHER OPTION IS TO APPEAL
TO THE OTHER OPTION IS TO APPEAL
TO THE STATE OTHER OPTION IS TO APPEAL
TO THE STATE SUPREME OTHER OPTION IS TO APPEAL
TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT. TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT. TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT.
THAT’S TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT.
THAT’S MOST TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT.
THAT’S MOST LIKELY TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT.
THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT.
THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL TO THE STATE SUPREME COURT.
THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL A THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL A THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL A
LONGSHOT THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL A
LONGSHOT AND THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL A
LONGSHOT AND A THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL A
LONGSHOT AND A LONG THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL A
LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY THAT’S MOST LIKELY BUT STILL A
LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY. LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY. LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY.
ME LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY.
ME THE LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY.
ME THE MONEY LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY.
ME THE MONEY IT LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY.
ME THE MONEY IT MAY LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY.
ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT LONGSHOT AND A LONG WAY AWAY.
ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE
BEEN ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE
BEEN QUITE ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE
BEEN QUITE YET ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE
BEEN QUITE YET THE ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE
BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE
BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME ME THE MONEY IT MAY NOT HAVE
BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME THE BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME THE BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME THE
MONEY BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME THE
MONEY PART BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME THE
MONEY PART MAYBE BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME THE
MONEY PART MAYBE EVEN BEEN QUITE YET THE SHOW ME THE
MONEY PART MAYBE EVEN LONGER MONEY PART MAYBE EVEN LONGER MONEY PART MAYBE EVEN LONGER
BECAUSE MONEY PART MAYBE EVEN LONGER
BECAUSE THE MONEY PART MAYBE EVEN LONGER
BECAUSE THE CITY MONEY PART MAYBE EVEN LONGER
BECAUSE THE CITY CAN’T MONEY PART MAYBE EVEN LONGER
BECAUSE THE CITY CAN’T BE BECAUSE THE CITY CAN’T BE BECAUSE THE CITY CAN’T BE
FORCED BECAUSE THE CITY CAN’T BE
FORCED TO BECAUSE THE CITY CAN’T BE
FORCED TO PAY BECAUSE THE CITY CAN’T BE
FORCED TO PAY THESE BECAUSE THE CITY CAN’T BE
FORCED TO PAY THESE JUDGMENTS FORCED TO PAY THESE JUDGMENTS FORCED TO PAY THESE JUDGMENTS
AS FORCED TO PAY THESE JUDGMENTS
AS SO FORCED TO PAY THESE JUDGMENTS
AS SO MANY FORCED TO PAY THESE JUDGMENTS
AS SO MANY PEOPLE FORCED TO PAY THESE JUDGMENTS
AS SO MANY PEOPLE WHO FORCED TO PAY THESE JUDGMENTS
AS SO MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE AS SO MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE AS SO MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE
OUTSTANDING AS SO MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE
OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AS SO MANY PEOPLE WHO HAVE
OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST
THE OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST
THE CITY’S OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST
THE CITY’S KNOWS OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST
THE CITY’S KNOWS AND OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST
THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST
THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN SOME OUTSTANDING JUDGMENTS AGAINST
THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN SOME OF THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN SOME OF THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN SOME OF
THESE THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN SOME OF
THESE CASES THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN SOME OF
THESE CASES THE THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN SOME OF
THESE CASES THE CASES THE CITY’S KNOWS AND IN SOME OF
THESE CASES THE CASES ARE THESE CASES THE CASES ARE THESE CASES THE CASES ARE
DECADES THESE CASES THE CASES ARE
DECADES OLD THESE CASES THE CASES ARE
DECADES OLD BUT THESE CASES THE CASES ARE
DECADES OLD BUT THIS THESE CASES THE CASES ARE
DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS THESE CASES THE CASES ARE
DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS A THESE CASES THE CASES ARE
DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS A CLASS DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS A CLASS DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS A CLASS
ACTION. DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS A CLASS
ACTION. IT DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS A CLASS
ACTION. IT INVOLVED DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS A CLASS
ACTION. IT INVOLVED SOME DECADES OLD BUT THIS IS A CLASS
ACTION. IT INVOLVED SOME 200000 ACTION. IT INVOLVED SOME 200000 ACTION. IT INVOLVED SOME 200000
POTENTIAL ACTION. IT INVOLVED SOME 200000
POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. ACTION. IT INVOLVED SOME 200000
POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO ACTION. IT INVOLVED SOME 200000
POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO THE POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO THE POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO THE
CITY POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO THE
CITY IS POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO THE
CITY IS I POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO THE
CITY IS I THINK POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO THE
CITY IS I THINK REALLY POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS. SO THE
CITY IS I THINK REALLY STUDYING CITY IS I THINK REALLY STUDYING CITY IS I THINK REALLY STUDYING
WHAT CITY IS I THINK REALLY STUDYING
WHAT ITS CITY IS I THINK REALLY STUDYING
WHAT ITS OPTIONS CITY IS I THINK REALLY STUDYING
WHAT ITS OPTIONS ARE CITY IS I THINK REALLY STUDYING
WHAT ITS OPTIONS ARE AT CITY IS I THINK REALLY STUDYING
WHAT ITS OPTIONS ARE AT THIS WHAT ITS OPTIONS ARE AT THIS